+1(646)631-6696
Journal Logo

Journal of Fertility and Reproductive Health

OPEN ACCESS

Mini Review
Innovations in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: Benefits and challenges
Erica Fader1, Jocelyn Nensi2 and Gulden Gysler3  
fadererica@stmichaelsfoundation.com

1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, St. Michael's Hospital, Canada
2Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, USA
3Department of Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Italy

Author Info »



ABSTRACT

Minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) has revolutionized the operation of colorful gynecological conditions, offering significant advancements over traditional open surgery. crucial inventions similar as laparoscopic, robotic- supported, and single- harborage ways have advanced surgical perfection, reduced recovery times, and minimized complications. Robotic- supported surgery, in particular, has enhanced dexterity and visualization, easing complex procedures with bettered issues. likewise, the integration of 3D imaging and stoked reality offers surgeons more navigation and delicacy. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, including the high cost of technical outfit, limited availability, and the steep literacy wind associated with new technologies. Training and skill development are critical to ensure optimal case issues, yet difference in training vacuity persist. also, the operation of MIGS to more complex or high- threat cases remain a challenge. As the field continues to evolve, ongoing exploration, bettered training programs, and cost-effective results will be essential in expanding the reach and benefits of minimally invasive ways for gynecologic surgery.



KEYWORDS

    1. Laparoscopic surgery
    2. Robotic-assisted surgery
    3. Single-port surgery
    4. 3D imaging
    5. Augmented reality
    6. Surgical precision


Author Info

Erica Fader1, Jocelyn Nensi2 and Gulden Gysler3

1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, St. Michael's Hospital, Canada
2Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, USA
3Department of Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Italy


Corresponding author: fadererica@stmichaelsfoundation.com

© 2025 Reseapro Journals